Thread:Brywarrior/@comment-1824169-20160802143201/@comment-1824169-20160804002214

Brywarrior wrote: I wasn't trying to get you mad, but it was kinda funny to see that overreaction, not gonna lie. But seriously, YOU are not profiting from your art, correct? YOU have a free art service among other services that you provide of your own free will. I'm not saying that no one has ever profited from art, I'm saying that the people I've "stolen" from aren't. And how is giving Aaron exposure (like in the example I provided) not what it's doing? If I told people to check out his work, does that not point people to his work? I mean, seriously, CaT, you gotta think about these things before you send them out. Must be hard to see how tall your high horse is with your head stuck up your own rear.

A: Free art services are created out of a love for art and a generous spirit. You can't really compare that to commercial or private art.

B: You don't even know who you've stolen from. How could you possibly make that assertion? I admit I harped on this poitn a bit much, but even stealing art that isn't making a profit is a really jerk thing to do.

C: I never argued that you weren't giving him exposure, I argued that said exposure is useless in a professional setting. Unless you have thousands of fans, it's extremely unlikely any "exposure" from you is going to help.

D: I could say the same thing to you.