Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5486221-20160815070330/@comment-28063203-20160820193022

StreetMaster wrote: PrimalFan wrote: StreetMaster wrote: You do realize if he's changed there is literall no point in giving him a one-week period, right? That's not what the one-week period is for. It's for if we can actually trust Sif has truly changed, and if he hasn't, then we'd block him again. There is a point in it. Primal, did you actually see Greenwatch's response? He is suggesting, we give him "the one week period AFTER he's changed" that doesn't make any sense. I wasn't speaking about Green's response, though. " we should just have like a test week and if we feel it's not a good idea the admins could just ban him again or something." - Rob.

Then we should do the same for all of the other blocked people by bringing them back, because if they break the rule they'll just get blocked. /s