Thread:Aaronbill3/@comment-39362585-20191010165859/@comment-24922135-20191010231426

Having read that I have no idea what "dark matter is not a weakness" means. I assume you're conflating Antimatter and Dark Matter? Dark Matter is harmless. It's a theoretical substance required to make our theories about the universe actually function when simulated by somehow making celestial bodies possess a greater mass than they actually should. There is also Dark Energy, which does the opposite in a way. It 'exists' to explain why the expansion of the universe is accelerating.

Antimatter is a form of matter that annihilates and produces a lot of energy when it comes into contact with regular, positive matter. Apparently it shouldn't be naturally occurring which I disagree heavily with until someone can explain to me why equal amounts of +matter and -matter was created in the Big Bang but all of the -matter was destroyed not long after via +matter-contact yet some +matter survived. Seems more reasonable to me that large amounts of both were thrown across the growing cosmos and, because astronomical units are so vast that their can be galaxies of antimatter, naturally speaking +matter and -matter will never touch.