Board Thread:Site Suggestions/@comment-5486221-20141012082205/@comment-4050367-20141128015409

I was asked if this should be approved, and I'm going to say this:

I oppose this at the moment.

(I would use the Oppose template but its messing up) -- It's too general to be approved. Duplicate and singular categories are okay because they are already approved, but the rest are way too general and not well-described to have me convinced. "Categories which only apply to 10 pages", like this. What if the category is for something small (like a project a user is working on or something) but it's not 11+ pages? That shouldn't get deleted. Power Categories? I don't see the error in this. As for categories like "Category:Awesome"... quite frankly I think everything I right is awesome. So why can't I have this as a category? There needs to be some major changes to this proposal before I agree to it. Guidelines need to be established as to what's okay and what's not, systems need to be put into place to determine which categories need or don't need to be deleted, etc. I also have asked for some clarification on these categories, a list of examples, etc, but haven't gotten it. I just don't understand the "10 or less pages = deletion", "no more power, speculation, and appearance" categories, and until this is clarified, until some changes are made, until guidelines are created, and we figure out how this whole thing is gonna work before we start removing categories and deleting them, I'm opposing this.