User blog comment:ZeVikingSif/I Got An Unfair Warning (PLEASE READ!)/@comment-4897796-20150520210739

Well, I guess I should take this from a neutral point of view. While most of your "charges" arent very stable and accurate, (such as Ben 10 spoilers around here being very commonplace contrary to TASM2 spoilers, which are not. Thus, Sub does have a sort of a point. Then again, spoilers themselves in general have been outlawed. But maybe they were forbidden AFTER sub said them.) Eitherway, we have always needed a reform to our policies regarding what gets a warning and what doesnt. Paper and Sci's editting of the rules in late 2014 itself was a very helpful step, but I suspect we do need an additional policy regarding what gets a warning and what doesnt. Now instead of balatantly blabbering all over the place which I am currently doing, I will suggest a solution to please either parties. Lets hold an Admin meeting (with Admin presence being required and Chatmod presence being optional and limited) to discuss exactly wjat gets a warning and what doesnt. I also suggest having a non chatmod/admin participate so we can have democracy in the meeting. The results would then be adddd to a guide made for Chatmods and Admins for this particular issue, or as a section in the Rules page. Those are my two cents to please both parties. Ahmad out.