Thread:Aaronbill3/@comment-28716546-20170416070909/@comment-24922135-20170416121418

Probably just 7/10.

Killing a dalek makes no sense for multiple reasons on its own. For one she took the form of the suit, not the dalek. Meaning she killed the suit part which is considerably more difficult. Two: the suits are watertight. They'd be pretty useless if they weren't and on multiple occasions they are shown in a vacuum.

Also those weren't Thals. I forget what they were but they were not Thals. All I remember right now is that they had a battle computer that equaled the daleks, so the daleks had to resurrect Davros to help.

I wasnt really hyped for it myself, so I'm not really disappointed on that front. But it was a bloody slow episode that did not get very far off the ground.

Also it had 23 Billion years to get to that planet. The Doctor said himself they went to the future as well iirc. Which makes it annoying that Bill asks if the dalek conflict happens in the future. It's kinda implied it happens in the past- which makes 0 sense.

Also: Why would you invent intelligent oil as an engine component that was, itself, capable of intergalactic travel?