Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-5101200-20160419142102/@comment-5101200-20160420030117

" zero error codings " Right, and that's why it was horrendously glitchy, huh? Because it hd zero error codings? Is that right?

And no, it's not an opinion that it's less sloppy. You've got a clean desk vs a horrendously messy desk, which one is less sloppy? The clean desk. And when the coding got fixed, it was the clean desk.

" easily do in a different way " Right, because you're going to have to still re-add everything meaning you still have to go in and edit the pages with it and add in more than what this is, which is just like, 30 seconds worth of editing? If that?

Well, when it basically is salt, going against it when it's helping, I kinda can call it salt.

Fine. Forget I actually helped. Forget I actually did help because you wanted it to go back to being horrendously glitchy and sloppy. The one time I actually help the wiki someone comes along and says "No, this doesn't help. I mean yes it does help but no it doesn't even though it does."

Revert it back to the bad coding and the sloppiness that it was. Even though that's not the better decision.

Yeah. Makes so much sense.