Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-6883075-20150924035559/@comment-4969948-20150924213412

Monitor071 wrote: Yoponot wrote: ^ that

Also we where told to remove red links and stuff, not add a-z. We were told to add A to Z months ago, when it was introduced. I have a few comments for the both of you on this. And after reading the amount of comments flooding my email while I had the slim amount of freetime at school today (I have since disbanded any notifications), I can see why you guys are saying the A to Z category is useless.

Yopo: Yes, we are supposed to remove red links and stuff, I have been trying to do that, but there is a small wikia glitch happening with the wanted pages. It disappeared for around five days, but it suddenly came back last night. I moved to A to Z thinking it was the secondary important topic to handle on the wiki, as wanted pages wasn't working.

Shades: We were, actually, not really "told" to add A to Z when it was introduced, it was more improvised that it would help. However, that was months ago; things have changed since then, and we have moved on to more pressing wikia matters, such as the red links.

Also, how that wanted pages is up and running again, 'I suggest everyone who has been handling that and moved to A to Z to return back to fixating red links. '