User blog comment:Sci100/Defintion and Rules of the Omniverse/@comment-4848837-20141013011820/@comment-3441048-20141013020233

Timelines are not their own dimension. I don't know where you got that from. It's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly thimey whimey stuff but in all seriousness a time line is like an alternate reality that was created to due to the change of events in the time stream/past. For example, if I were to write the letter A on a piece of paper instead of the letter B that would create an alternate timeline... which is similar to the dimension theory where the course of events creates dimensions so I can now see how they were easily mistaken but its the change of events not the course. In an alternate timeline, its not so much of a copy like a dimension but a save file which everything identical to it but you decided to change a sentence which led to someone else editing the rest of it in order for it to make sense while with dimensions you can just write and work from there while writing something different on the other copy and working from there.

As for the rules, I have to sort of agree with you. I understand what you're trying to say, Sci, but some of them don't make sense like no fourth wall breaking. I can understand that its not allowed and not possible in reality but it happens in occasional media. Also I feel like travel between Multiverses is in fact possible but it just requires a high force of power like unbelievable power. I mean if you can fictionally create universes which form a multiverse then surely you can fictionally create a source of power that can break through the barriers of the multiverses. It doesn't have to mean that a fictional character could enter our world but I dunno. You sort of get me there but you kinda have to ask yourself if a franchise has its own multiverse then how do they manage to cross over to another one? Unless both universes are in the same multiverse but what if it isn't or can't be because of issues with the writers? I feel like travel between mutiverses should be put on debate. Also, no offense sif, but I feel like the only multiverses that really matter is the Canonverse, Realityverse and BTFFverse. The rest of the multiverses are just there in the Omniverse because what if a universe in the BTFFverse changes into a mutiverse or is revealed to be a multiverse and wasn't in the BTFFverse in the first place. In fact, since Multiverse 71 is basically a franchise on BTFF, shouldn't that mean that its apart of the BTFFverse which is actually bigger than we thought it was? Sorry for the long comment but I think a lot about this stuff. Thanks again for bringing this back up. You did a great job.