Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-7503158-20150612071613/@comment-4050367-20150612162403

When users do give warnings out, if its for a valid reason, I usually say "Although they are not an administrator, consider their warning to be is if I said it myself", making it official. I then say "appreciate the help, but techincally you're not supposed to give warnings", and I leave it at that.

I think you have good intentions, but as Sif said, how it's executed and how it impacts the community, how it impacts the administration, etc. needs to be examined.

Also by the time you see this, you'll see a lot of opposes. It's okay to have opposes, and I'm glad that users are at least voicing their opinion, as you have. As Sif has. That is good, its good to propose things, its good for the community to suggest things and debate things. Discussion is good. Don't take this as no one listens to you, take this as "wow people are actually willing to listen to me, I'm worth actually debating with". I am proud that you are at least trying to make a change, some users don't really do anything or suggest anything. So I do commend you on that, but then again after all, you are a pretty cool dude lol.