Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-4969948-20160715192923/@comment-26572435-20160717045030

( I mean, Toon and I get along.)

Let's say: Johnny continues to be an issue and Toon is still not willing to fully handle it properly due to the relation. I mean, if Toon is not fully able to do his job regarding users who violate rules, then he shouldn't be in that position. You should be fully committed in handling misbehaving users specifically for this situation. Johnny asked to be an admin which is against the rules and he is very underqualified. Unless Toon is willing to treat Johnny like any user on the wiki and not involve the personal factor into it, Toon should not hold his position here. We need all staff on here to be committed and as I said, Toon is not fully committed from what has occured here. I mean, I don't see Toon as anyone different from then to now but he's just not suitable from the looks of it. I am supporting for the sake of the wiki and doing such for precaution to avoid less in-staff conflict. In the end, we need organization and stability.

Just because I support the decision at this very moment, that does not mean I'm not going to be any different regarding Toon who was nice from the start. It's not personal, it's just business ( in the sense for the wiki's flow and well being.)