Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-4050367-20130715195752

As some of you may have known, it was decided that would be demoted from adminship and Bureaucratship because of their inactiveness. However, since most of these users were indeed Bureaucrats, staff told us that the community has to decide if to demote these users or not. So honestly, you guys get to decide.
 * 1) Batking30
 * 2) Kangaroopower
 * 3) Lumin8
 * 4) Omernoy121
 * 5) Redoalien
 * 6) Weirdo Guy and...
 * 7) Waiyenoo111

Now before any " protests " occur, allow me to explain why I personally believe they should be demoted. These users have been inactive for a very long time. Active means making edits constantly, not just a few edits a day and then not editing for a few months. That's not being active.

They've all been inactive for months, aren't involved in community discussions, don't talk on chat, no longer delete pages, make categories, solve problems with users, etc. They don't block trolls, vandals, sockpuppets, etc.

So, my question is, is there any reason you guys can come up with that these users SHOULD keep their rights? We want to know if you feel they should or should not be demoted.

If we could, it would be great if we had a majority vote by 1:00 PM EDT (5:OO UTC) on Wednesday, July 31st, 2013? (meaning the majority of the community has chosen to demote them or not). 