Board Thread:General Wiki Discussion/@comment-5486221-20151231012039/@comment-26812877-20160404014834

Oh no, I see that PokeRob is here. Be extra sure that your informative sources are extra credible or PokeRob will try to make you look ignorant no matter how right you are. It happened before when it was proven that MOA wasn't involved with the Ben 10 sequel shows. Also, be careful about using Wikipedia sources, even though those very sources have a Reference section that lists all the official sources that the information came from and still have a degree of credibility.

jk jk

And no duh that I know that they're rebooting the franchise and not just the Original Series. Either way, it's still a reboot of the Original Series; especially since that CN is using the same exact premise of the Original Series for the reboot. The fact that it's a reboot of the entire Ben 10 franchise is what I like and favor. The fact that it's also an unnecessary reboot of the Original Series instead of being a more necessary and ideal reboot of Alien Force is what I don't like and don't favor.

As for Ghostfreak and Zs'Skayr, it depends on how they introduce them in the reboot. In the Original Series, the build up and introduction to Zs'Skayr was done very well hence one of the major reason why Ghostfreak is such a favorite to many fans. If we don't get a proper build up and introduction for Zs'Skayr in the reboot or not even get Zs'Skayr and Ghostfreak at all, a lot of fans and viewers are not going to be happy about it. Carbon copy or new, what matters more is that they just do it in a good way. To just do it right. Yes, they could surprise us but chances are they could surprise us in a bad way, although I'm hoping that they'll surprise us in a good way. So, would a different introduction to Zs'Skayr be a bad thing? Again, it depends on how they do it and how fans and viewers will react to it. For me, I don't mind that much as to whether it's new or a carbon copy. Just do it good or great and do it right.